AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Engauge digitizer online3/23/2023 ![]() Comparison of tools reveals that ycasd is a good compromise between easy and quick capturing of scientific data from publications and complexity. We conclude that our tool is suitable for convenient and accurate data retrievals from graphical representations such as papers. Finally, we provide a short summary of our experiences with ycasd in the context of modelling. We extensively compare the functionality and other features of ycasd with other publically available tools. For subsequent processing of extracted data points, results can be formatted as a Matlab or an R matrix. All options of ycasd are accessible through a single window which eases handling and speeds up data extraction. A major advantage of ycasd is that it does not require a certain input file format to open and process figures. ![]() ResultsĪfter describing the general functionality and providing an overview of the programme interface, we demonstrate on an example how to use ycasd. After establishing a coordinate system by simple axes definitions, it supports convenient retrieval of data points from arbitrary figures. For this purpose, we developed the freely available open source tool ycasd. Hence, in order to include these data into environments used for model simulations and statistical analyses, it is necessary to extract them from their presentations in the literature. It is common practice that clinical data are not available in raw formats but are provided as graphical representations. The other reason, of course, is that bitmap figures look ugly.Mathematical modelling of biological processes often requires a large variety of different data sets for parameter estimation and validation. The ability to do this is just one more reason to not submit figures as bitmaps. (4) Scale these arbitrary X, Y data to the correct coordinate scale, via careful measuring and/or comparison with outputs from the digitizers above. (3) Convert the postscript code into standard (X, Y) coordinates - I have a Python function to do this. I use InkScape, which lets me click-select the curve I want and see the underlying code directly (in “Edit” –> “XML Editor”), and then I copy-and-paste it. (2) Rip the desired PostScript code from the figure - this looks something like “m 5328.86,3663.79 -1.98,-1147.75…” - and save it into a text file. (1) Download the document source from the arXiv (select “Other formats,” then “Source”) I only know how to do this with PostScript figures, and here’s how: Most such tools tend to focus on extracting data from a digitized bitmap, but if you don’t want to lose information your best bet is to extract the vectorial data directly from the figure. This is a fairly perverse case, as there are multiple overlapping curves but it took less than a half-hour, start to finish, including send the output text files to my collaborator. I used the curve-finding algorithm to follow one of the curves the digitized points are shown by little red dots. Here’s an example from a recent paper (Mannucci et al. Plus you can save the whole project, should you need to come back later and alter a fit. You can organize your digitized data into multiple datasets, which you can save as text files. I used to use Dexter, but now I’m in love with GraphClick ($8, shareware.) Just screengrab the plot, paste it into GraphClick, click a few key points on the x and y axes and type in coordinates, and then either choose your data by hand, or use one of GraphClick’s curve-finding algorithms to automatically identify data. I could write the author and wait several days for them to dig up the plot file and send me the digitized version, but I want to compare now!” One solution is to digitize the published plot. Here’s a common workflow: “I want to overplot a curve from the literature on my new plot.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |